Class President!
Full Member
I was class president of my high school class! Me, Ludvig!
Posts: 754
|
Post by Class President! on Aug 1, 2003 0:12:26 GMT -5
I've put my money on Freddy. He's just smarter and faster and more manipulative than Jason. And the fact is, Jason's just brute force, and Krueger's not going to be Stewpid enough to just stand there and take it.
Besides, it'll go like this...Jason goes to that little hut he has and falls asleep. And BAM! end of move. Freddy wins. Roll credits.
|
|
|
Post by Hollywood Humplik on Aug 1, 2003 2:05:40 GMT -5
Some clever teenagers will kill both of them.
|
|
|
Post by justindr1 on Aug 1, 2003 8:41:35 GMT -5
I may be biased, as Freddy was the one i watched as a kid, but Freddy just has to wait for Jason to fall asleep. Now, Jason Vs. Leatherface...
|
|
KAMALAMEAT
Junior Member
Sorry Orson had to go, but luckily Satin's here!
Posts: 319
|
Post by KAMALAMEAT on Aug 1, 2003 9:30:33 GMT -5
As far as characters are concerned I definately like Jason Vorhees better for the simple fact that he is just evil and kills without mercy, no bad jokes, no boring build up, just good old slasher fun, but I still have to give it to Freddy Krugar on this one. I mean Krugar has so many tricks he can pull on Jason while Jason is stictly a one dimensional characters. As long as there's a definite winner I'm happy and I think there will be since New Line has a natural biase towards Freddy as they made him the star he is, while Paramount made Jason therefore inforcing the McMahon logic.
|
|
|
Post by Jessie Spano on Aug 2, 2003 1:11:12 GMT -5
I'm a HUGE fan of 80's horror-movies (specifically Jason, Freddy, and, most of all, Chucky), so, as bad as I'm sure the upcoming movie is going to be, I'm gonna go see it anyway.
As for the poll, Freddy could kick Jason's ass any day of the week. (Of course, Chucky would eat both of them for lunch, but, seeing as the execs knew "Freddy vs. Jason vs. Chucky" would be too lop-sided, I'll go with Freddy.)
On a semi-related note, they just released a full 8-disc "Nightmare on Elm Street" compilation-set (only $70 at the Walmart by me); I'm definitely pickin' that up soon.
|
|
|
Post by Azrael98 on Aug 2, 2003 4:03:19 GMT -5
On a semi-related note, they just released a full 8-disc "Nightmare on Elm Street" compilation-set (only $70 at the Walmart by me); I'm definitely pickin' that up soon. Hasn't that DVD set been out for a couple of years?
|
|
|
Post by Jessie Spano on Aug 2, 2003 10:06:52 GMT -5
Has it? My bad; I only first saw it a few days ago.
|
|
|
Post by InsaneClown on Aug 3, 2003 5:29:19 GMT -5
There are going to be no winners, only losers. Especially us, the loyal movie watchers. Just like Vince, filmmakers should learn....resurrecting legends are just waste of time and money. Eg. Hogan, Piper, JASON X, HALLOWEEN: RESURRECTION, Hogan, Hogan, Hogan.....
|
|
Deathbot1
Junior Member
Um, Holy Shit!
Posts: 112
|
Post by Deathbot1 on Aug 3, 2003 19:29:14 GMT -5
Somehow, I suspect bullshit.
In the end, the most unpopular kid in school will pull out some easy way to kill them both out his ass.
The movie should just be 2 hours of them brawling, with mabye a little no-line extra murder.
Now that I think about it, watch Chucky make a surprise showing and kill them both.
|
|
|
Post by Disciple of Kat Meyers on Aug 6, 2003 3:43:26 GMT -5
My advice to Freddy: "Shoot on him!'
Seriously, I don't think either of them will "win" and the dumb teens who survive (probably a girl and her boyfriend) will defeat them both at the zero hour.
The ultimate swerve; a pissed off Wes Craven comes out and decapitates everyone with a chainsaw for bastardizing his creation even more, and Jason cries.
|
|
|
Post by justindr1 on Aug 6, 2003 23:31:18 GMT -5
I'm all for the Chucky run-in idea. He's my favorite.
|
|
trollface
Full Member
She's mad, but we like that.
Posts: 555
|
Post by trollface on Aug 15, 2003 15:39:06 GMT -5
I'm not going to vote, because I've just seen it, so I know who wins.
Let me just say that this film kicked arse. I was sure it was going to be a peice of shit, but it had an almost entirely coherent plot, good acting from our heroes (don't mention the teenagers, even Katharine Isabelle; Kirzinger owns Hodder's manky arse), a wicked couple of fights between the characters, subtle references to past installments of both series (without going into post-Scream-style self parody) and enough blood and nudity to keep people happy.
Oh, and Freddy is an absolute cunt in this one (even though he has one or two too jokey moments, there aren't too many of them). For the first time you really get a sense that he's not just a child-killer, but a child-molestor, too.
If you like either charcter, go see it. If you don't, go see it, and you might start liking them.
[Edited to add]BTW, that's "Voorhees".
[Edited to add again]It's also "Kreuger".
|
|
|
Post by justindr1 on Aug 15, 2003 15:50:31 GMT -5
Sounds sweet. I saw a review that gave it 8/10. So, by nudity, do you mean we get to see Kelly Rowlands' bare booty-licious?
|
|
trollface
Full Member
She's mad, but we like that.
Posts: 555
|
Post by trollface on Aug 15, 2003 16:15:21 GMT -5
Nope, you get to see some bird with fake tits a lot at the beginning (and I do mean a lot), and a very good lookalike for a Katharine Isabel body-double shower scene.
|
|
|
Post by Disciple of Kat Meyers on Aug 21, 2003 3:27:44 GMT -5
All I've got to say is: That flick was Too Sweeeeeeet!! Seriously, It coulda totally sucked, but it was awesome! For more nonsense, check out my site at jayhorror.20m.com/
|
|